20+ year of experience
Trial ready
Personal attention
Few allegations move a CPS case forward faster than substance abuse. Whether it’s a positive drug test at a hospital, a report from a family member, or an arrest, allegations involving drugs or alcohol can trigger an immediate investigation and, in some cases, removal of a child from the home. Understanding how California’s juvenile dependency system treats substance abuse can help parents know what to expect and why having the right attorney early on matters so much.
California’s Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300 lists the specific grounds that allow a juvenile court to take jurisdiction over a child. Substance abuse allegations most often fall under subdivision (b), which covers failure to protect a child due to neglect, including a parent’s inability to supervise or care for a child because of drug or alcohol use.
A case doesn’t have to involve direct harm to a child to move forward. Courts can find jurisdiction based on the risk substance abuse creates, such as a parent using drugs while a young child is in the home, a positive toxicology screen at a child’s birth, or a pattern of behavior that raises safety concerns even without an injury.
If a child is removed based on substance abuse allegations, the case typically moves through the same structured hearings as any other dependency matter:
At each stage, evidence quality matters. Toxicology results, police reports, and social worker observations are often contested, and an attorney experienced in substance abuse cases will know how to challenge weak or incomplete evidence.
In most substance-related cases, parents are offered reunification services designed to address the underlying issue rather than simply punish the parent. A typical case plan may include:
Progress is reviewed at regular intervals, typically at six-month and twelve-month review hearings, where the court evaluates whether a parent has made meaningful progress toward the case plan.
Reunification services aren’t guaranteed in every case. Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 361.5(b)(13), a court may deny, or “bypass,” reunification services if it finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that a parent has a history of extensive, chronic drug or alcohol abuse and has resisted court-ordered treatment during the three years before the case was filed.
This is a high bar, and courts have reversed cases where this finding was misapplied. A parent who is actively engaged in treatment, even after a past relapse, may still be entitled to services. This is exactly the kind of legal nuance where experienced counsel makes a meaningful difference in the outcome of a case.
Some California counties offer specialized Family Preservation Court programs for parents whose cases involve substance abuse. These programs combine intensive court supervision with treatment and counseling, giving families a structured path to stay together, or reunify more quickly, while addressing the root of the problem. An attorney familiar with these programs can help determine whether a family qualifies and advocate for placement in one.
Facing a substance abuse allegation in a CPS or juvenile dependency case? Contact ALL Trial Lawyers today at (866) 811-4255 for a free consultation with an attorney who focuses exclusively on protecting parents and keeping families together.
Q: Can my child be removed just because I tested positive for drugs?
A: A positive test alone isn’t always enough. Courts generally look at whether the substance use created an actual risk to the child’s safety, though a positive test can still trigger an investigation and, in some cases, removal.
Q: What if I relapse during my case plan?
A: A single relapse doesn’t automatically end reunification efforts. Courts have found that a parent’s overall engagement in treatment matters, and a relapse alone doesn’t necessarily meet the legal standard for denying services.
Q: How long do I have to complete my case plan?
A: Timelines vary by case, but reunification services are typically reviewed at six and twelve months, with a maximum period set by law depending on the child’s age and case circumstances.
Source: LegalClarity — Understanding California’s WIC 300 Criteria, Allegations, and Outcomes
All fields are required. If you need immediate assistance, do not hesitate to call us at (866) 811-4255.
Mohammad Abuershaid, professionally known as Mo Abuershaid, is the founding partner of ALL Trial Lawyers and one of California’s most trusted authorities in dependency law, juvenile dependency cases, CPS defense, and high stakes CPS cases.