20+ year of experience
Trial ready
Personal attention
A sex crime charge is unlike any other criminal accusation. The consequences attach before you are ever convicted, they follow you for decades or for life, and they close doors that can never be reopened. You need a defense attorney who handles these cases regularly and understands what is actually at stake.
Sex crime prosecutions are among the most aggressively pursued cases in the California court system. District attorneys assign experienced specialized prosecutors. The cases often rest on testimony rather than physical evidence, which means the entire outcome can turn on how a defense attorney handles witness credibility, cross-examination, and the presentation of alternative narratives. A lawyer who handles mostly traffic tickets or business disputes is not equipped for this work.
Beyond courtroom advocacy, the strategic choices your attorney makes before trial have permanent life consequences. Whether a particular charge requires registration under Penal Code § 290, which registration tier applies, whether a negotiated resolution can avoid registration entirely, and how plea structures affect immigration status are all decisions that require precise knowledge of California sex crimes law. A single misinformed choice cannot be corrected after the fact.
ALL Trial Lawyers brings genuine courtroom experience to sex crimes defense across Orange County, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego. The firm has handled more than 10,000 criminal cases, conducted 75 or more trials, and appeared in over 150 preliminary hearings. Our attorneys understand both the law and the human cost these charges impose on individuals and families. Our goal in every case is the best achievable outcome, and we pursue it with the full resources of a firm that was built for trial.
Our criminal defense practice covers every stage of the process, from the moment you are contacted by police through trial, sentencing, and any available post-conviction relief.
Free and confidential consultation available. Phones answered every day. Call (866) 811-4255 or contact us online. Hablamos Español.
California sex crimes statutes cover a wide range of conduct, and the applicable charge matters enormously. The difference between charges, and between felony and misdemeanor treatment within the same statute, can determine whether registration is required, how long it lasts, whether immigration consequences attach, and what sentences are available. Below is an accurate summary of the principal statutes your attorney must know.
Penal Code ¬ß 261 defines rape as non-consensual sexual intercourse accomplished by force, fear, fraud, or other specified circumstances. Effective January 1, 2022, California completed reforms that eliminated the prior distinction between “rape” and “spousal rape,” making the statute gender-neutral and removing the marital exception in full. Rape under ¬ß 261 is a felony punishable by three, six, or eight years in state prison, with enhanced terms where the victim is a minor or aggravating factors exist. Conviction triggers Tier 3 lifetime registration under Penal Code ¬ß 290.
Penal Code ¬ß 261.5, commonly called “statutory rape,” prohibits sexual intercourse with a person under 18 regardless of consent. The offense is a “wobbler” when the age difference is three years or less, meaning the prosecutor may charge it as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Critically, ¬ß 261.5 does not automatically require sex offender registration, but the court retains discretion to impose registration. The distinction between this statute and forcible rape under ¬ß 261 is significant both legally and in terms of consequences. A charge under ¬ß 261.5 carries very different sentencing exposure than a charge under ¬ß 261, and the defense approach differs accordingly.
Penal Code § 243.4 criminalizes touching the intimate part of another person against their will for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse. As a misdemeanor it carries up to one year in county jail. As an aggravated felony (for example, where the victim is restrained or institutionalized) it carries two, three, or four years in state prison and mandatory registration.
Penal Code ¬ß 288 prohibits any lewd or lascivious act upon a child under 14 with the intent to arouse or gratify. It is a felony carrying five, eight, or ten years in state prison. Where the act is committed by force or duress, or where the child is under 10, enhanced penalties apply. Conviction requires lifetime (Tier 3) registration. This statute is the foundation for “Chelsea’s Law” (2010) One Strike provisions, discussed below.
Penal Code § 288.5 applies where an adult residing with or having recurring access to a child under 14 engages in three or more acts of substantial sexual conduct over a period of three months or more. It carries six, twelve, or sixteen years in state prison and requires Tier 3 lifetime registration. This statute is frequently charged in cases involving family members or household adults.
The oral copulation statute was renumbered from Penal Code § 288a to Penal Code § 287 effective January 1, 2019. It prohibits non-consensual oral copulation. Where force, fear, or duress is present, penalties parallel those for rape. Non-consensual oral copulation of a minor under 14 carries up to eight years in state prison and mandatory Tier 3 registration.
Penal Code § 289 prohibits sexual penetration by a foreign object by force, violence, duress, menace, or fear. Penalties align with rape under § 261, and the offense carries Tier 3 lifetime registration requirements.
Penal Code §§ 311.1 through 311.11 criminalize the possession, distribution, importation, duplication, and production of matter depicting minors in sexual conduct. Possession alone (§ 311.11) is a wobbler. Distribution, production, and importation are generally felonies. These offenses may be prosecuted federally as well as under state law. See our federal criminal defense page for information on federal child exploitation statutes, which carry mandatory minimum sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 2252 and related provisions.
Penal Code ¬ß 647.6 is a misdemeanor on a first offense, punishable by up to one year in county jail, that applies to conduct motivated by sexual interest directed at a minor, even without physical contact. A second or subsequent conviction, or a first offense committed after entering a child’s home or vehicle, becomes a felony. Conviction requires sex offender registration.
Penal Code ¬ß 647(a) is a misdemeanor applicable to touching one’s own or another’s genitals, buttocks, or female breast in a public place or place open to public view, where someone is present who might be offended. This statute is frequently charged in connection with undercover law enforcement operations. Conviction can trigger registration at judicial discretion.
Penal Code ¬ß 314 makes it a misdemeanor on a first offense (felony upon a second or subsequent offense) to willfully and lewdly expose one’s private parts in a public place or in the presence of another person who might be offended. Conviction, even on a first misdemeanor, requires sex offender registration.
Penal Code ¬ß 647(j) includes California’s revenge pornography provision, criminalizing the intentional distribution of intimate images of another person without consent where the distributor knows or should know the distribution would cause substantial emotional distress. It is a misdemeanor carrying up to six months in county jail. Related provisions address recording in private areas. These charges are increasingly common and the digital evidence issues are complex.
Penal Code § 266h prohibits knowingly living off or receiving support from the earnings of a prostitute. Penal Code § 266i prohibits procuring another person for prostitution. Both are felonies. Where a minor is involved, penalties increase substantially. These charges often arise alongside human trafficking allegations.
Penal Code § 290 requires individuals convicted of specified sex offenses to register with local law enforcement. Effective January 1, 2021, California transitioned to a three-tier system under Senate Bill 384:
| Tier | Registration Period | Typical Offenses | Internet Posting (Megan’s Law) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Minimum 10 years | Misdemeanor sexual battery, indecent exposure (first offense), certain § 261.5 convictions | Generally not posted publicly unless law enforcement designates |
| Tier 2 | Minimum 20 years | Lewd acts on minor 14-15 (¬ß 288(c)), certain ¬ß 243.4 felony convictions | Posted on Megan’s Law website |
| Tier 3 | Lifetime | Rape (¬ß 261), lewd acts under 14 (¬ß 288), continuous abuse (¬ß 288.5), sexual penetration by force (¬ß 289), child pornography production, certain repeat offenses | Posted on Megan’s Law website |
Penal Code § 290.5, enacted as part of SB 384, allows Tier 1 registrants to petition for removal after completing the 10-year minimum and Tier 2 registrants after completing the 20-year minimum, provided they meet statutory criteria including no new convictions. Tier 3 registrants are generally not eligible to petition. The court must deny a petition if the individual is a Sexually Violent Predator or has been convicted of certain enumerated offenses. This petition process is one of the most important strategic considerations in negotiating resolutions.
California’s Chelsea’s Law, enacted in 2010, expanded One Strike provisions for certain sex offenses against children. Under One Strike laws, qualifying convictions (including forcible lewd acts on a child under 14 or sexual offenses involving specified aggravating factors) may result in a sentence of 25 years to life or life in prison without the possibility of parole. Chelsea’s Law also increased penalties for repeat sex offenders and strengthened parole conditions for those convicted of child sex offenses.
Proposition 83 (Jessica’s Law), enacted by voters in 2006, originally imposed blanket restrictions prohibiting registered sex offenders on parole from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park where children regularly gather. The California Supreme Court significantly curtailed these restrictions in In re Taylor, 60 Cal.4th 1019 (2015), holding that blanket enforcement of the residency restrictions against parolees in San Diego County was unconstitutional as applied because it effectively eliminated compliant housing options, rendering parole conditions unworkable. Following Taylor, residency restrictions for parolees must be based on individualized findings of risk and necessity rather than automatic blanket application. Local ordinances may still impose residency conditions, and conditions imposed by parole boards or courts as individualized requirements remain permissible. The practical effect of Jessica’s Law is significantly more limited than its text suggests.
The formal sentence is often the smallest part of what a sex crimes conviction costs you. The collateral consequences are lifelong and pervasive.
Felony sex offenses in California carry state prison terms ranging from two years (low end of misdemeanor-adjacent wobblers) to life without the possibility of parole (One Strike qualifying offenses). Most serious felony sex crimes carry determinate sentences in the range of three to sixteen years, with enhancements possible for factors including the victim’s age, use of force, and prior convictions.
Under the tiered system effective January 1, 2021, registration can last 10 years (Tier 1), 20 years (Tier 2), or a lifetime (Tier 3). Annual registration and address verification requirements are strict. Failure to register under Penal Code § 290 is itself a crime, potentially a felony where the underlying offense was a felony.
Penal Code ¬ß 290.46 requires the California Department of Justice to maintain a public internet website (Megan’s Law website) displaying information about registered sex offenders. Tier 2 and Tier 3 registrants are generally listed publicly. This public posting affects employment, housing applications, and personal relationships indefinitely.
Many California sex offense convictions qualify as “aggravated felonies” or “crimes involving moral turpitude” under federal immigration law. An aggravated felony conviction triggers mandatory deportation, bars re-entry, and strips the non-citizen of virtually all discretionary relief. For non-citizens, immigration consequences must be analyzed at the outset, and plea negotiations must account for immigration exposure. This applies to lawful permanent residents as well as undocumented individuals.
Sex offense convictions, and in many cases sex offender registration alone, are grounds for denial, suspension, or revocation of licenses issued by the California Medical Board, State Bar, Contractors State License Board, Board of Registered Nursing, and other state licensing agencies. Teaching credentials and childcare licenses are virtually always revoked. These consequences are administrative, not criminal, and run independently of the sentence.
Federal International Megan’s Law (enacted 2016) requires that a unique identifier be placed in the passports of covered sex offenders. The law also requires that the Department of Homeland Security provide advance notification to foreign governments when a covered sex offender intends to travel to their country. This effectively restricts international travel in ways that are often permanent.
A felony sex offense conviction results in a lifetime firearms prohibition under both California and federal law. Certain misdemeanor sex offense convictions also trigger firearms restrictions.
Registration status is visible to landlords and employers who conduct background checks. Many housing providers, employers, and professional organizations have policies that effectively bar registrants. Sex offenders on parole are subject to additional conditions including electronic monitoring, internet usage restrictions, and residency limitations.
A sex crime conviction can trigger administrative separation proceedings from the military, loss of security clearance, reduction in grade at discharge, and loss of veteran benefits including GI Bill eligibility. The Uniform Code of Military Justice has separate sex offense provisions, and active-duty personnel may face concurrent civilian and military proceedings.
The strategic goal of early defense intervention is to avoid or minimize as many of these consequences as possible. Once a conviction is entered, most of them are automatic. Call (866) 811-4255 for a confidential case assessment.
An effective sex crimes defense is built case by case. Generic approaches do not work here. The defenses available depend on the specific charge, the evidence, the identity of the complainant, and the investigation timeline. The following are the most significant defense approaches in California sex crimes cases.
Where the charged offense is one between adults, consent is a complete defense. California’s definition of consent under the rape statute requires positive affirmative agreement that is freely given and revocable. Where the defense is consent, the attorney must carefully develop the factual record, challenge the complainant’s account for internal inconsistencies, and address the jury’s assumptions about what consent looks like in practice.
False accusations of sex crimes arise in specific social contexts with identifiable patterns: contested custody and divorce proceedings, relationship conflicts with financial stakes, retaliation by an ex-partner, and institutional or workplace disputes. A defense attorney who understands these contexts can investigate the accuser’s motive, develop timeline evidence, obtain communications between the parties, and present the jury with a coherent explanation for why the accusation was made. Motive is not guilt, and showing motive is not the same as attacking the victim. It is the presentation of an alternative explanation that the jury is entitled to consider.
Eyewitness misidentification is a leading documented cause of wrongful convictions. In sex crimes, where the incident may have occurred in poor lighting, during a state of fear, or involved a brief encounter, identification errors are particularly common. Cross-racial identifications (where the witness and suspect are of different races) carry additional documented reliability concerns. Expert witnesses on eyewitness memory and identification procedures are a standard component of contested identification defenses.
DNA evidence, where present, must be evaluated for chain of custody, lab protocols, mixture interpretation, and the difference between presence of DNA and proof of a sex crime. Touch DNA and secondary transfer are increasingly contested issues. Where digital evidence is involved, including phones, computers, or cloud storage searched in child exploitation cases, search warrant validity under the Fourth Amendment must be examined. The United States Supreme Court held in Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), that law enforcement generally must obtain a warrant before searching the digital contents of a cell phone, and warrants that are overbroad or unsupported by adequate probable cause can be challenged under the exclusionary rule.
In child sex abuse prosecutions, the prosecution frequently introduces expert testimony based on the Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS) model to explain behaviors such as delayed reporting, recantation, or inconsistent disclosure. California courts permit CSAAS testimony for limited purposes: to explain why a child might not immediately report abuse, not to prove that abuse occurred. An experienced defense attorney will challenge overreach by CSAAS experts and pursue jury instructions that cabin the permissible uses of this testimony. The scientific validity and limits of CSAAS continue to be debated in courts and in the academic literature.
California has substantially extended the statute of limitations for sex crimes, particularly those involving child victims. Under Penal Code §§ 799, 800, and 801.1, charges for certain sex offenses against minors may be brought until the victim reaches age 40 or in some cases with no limitations period at all. The applicable limitations period depends on the specific offense, when it allegedly occurred, and whether the victim was a minor. Statute of limitations analysis can be dispositive in cases where the alleged conduct is decades old, and it requires careful review of the specific charging period.
Child pornography cases and online solicitation cases depend heavily on electronic evidence: IP address logs, device forensics, metadata, and account records. IP address attribution is not the same as device attribution, and device attribution is not the same as individual user attribution. Defense forensic experts can challenge the evidentiary chain, identify alternative explanations for how content came to be on a device, and assess whether law enforcement’s forensic procedures followed established protocols.
Polygraph examinations are inadmissible in California criminal proceedings under Kelly and statutory rules. Prosecutors sometimes encourage defendants to submit to polygraphs as part of plea or diversion negotiations. You should never take a polygraph without speaking with your attorney first. Polygraph results are unreliable and the process creates investigative exposure even when the examiner’s conclusions are excluded from evidence.
In many sex crimes cases, the most consequential decision is not the length of a sentence but whether a resolution requires registration and, if so, which tier applies. A Tier 1 outcome (10-year minimum) is categorically different from a Tier 3 (lifetime) outcome in terms of life consequences. In appropriate cases, the defense may negotiate resolutions to offenses that do not trigger mandatory registration at all. This tier-placement strategy requires detailed knowledge of which offenses carry mandatory registration, which are discretionary, and how plea structures interact with registration requirements. It is one of the highest-value services a skilled sex crimes attorney provides.
For clients who have already been convicted or who have accepted a plea and face immigration consequences, our firm also handles matters that intersect with domestic violence defense, which shares overlapping dynamics around false accusations and relationship-context allegations.
For clients seeking relief after conviction, note that expungement is severely limited for sex crimes. California Penal Code § 1203.4 expungement is generally unavailable for anyone sentenced to state prison and for most serious sex offenses. Our expungement page explains the narrow circumstances where some form of post-conviction relief may apply.
Understanding the process reduces fear and helps you make better decisions. Here is how a California sex crimes case typically proceeds.
People under investigation or arrest for sex crimes often make decisions under pressure that limit their attorney’s ability to help them. These are the most consequential errors.
If you or someone you care about is facing a sex crime investigation or charge in California, the steps you take in the next 24 to 72 hours matter greatly.
Founder Mohammad “Mo” Abuershaid spent years as an Orange County Public Defender before founding ALL Trial Lawyers. His background gives him direct insight into how the prosecution builds and presents sex crimes cases, which informs how our firm defends them. Learn more about Mo and the firm’s history at the Mo Abuershaid attorney profile page.
In sex crimes cases, experience and availability are not negotiable. Here is what distinguishes our firm.
Call now for a confidential consultation: (866) 811-4255. Available every day. Your call is protected by attorney-client privilege.
It depends on the specific charge and outcome. Many sex offenses carry mandatory registration under Penal Code § 290. Others are subject to discretionary registration, meaning the court decides whether to impose it. Some charges, including certain wobblers resolved as misdemeanors, may not require registration at all. The registration question is one of the most important factors in evaluating any plea offer or potential trial outcome. This is why you need an attorney who understands the registration implications of every charge and every possible resolution before you make any decision.
Under the tiered system effective January 1, 2021 (SB 384), registration lasts a minimum of 10 years for Tier 1 offenses, a minimum of 20 years for Tier 2 offenses, and a lifetime for Tier 3 offenses. These are minimums: you cannot petition for removal until the applicable period has passed, and petitions can be denied. Prior to January 1, 2021, California required lifetime registration for all covered offenses. Existing registrants were reclassified into the tiered system based on their offense of conviction.
Tier 1 covers lower-level offenses such as misdemeanor sexual battery, first-offense indecent exposure, and certain statutory violations where no force was involved. Tier 2 covers intermediate offenses such as lewd acts on a minor aged 14 or 15. Tier 3 covers the most serious offenses including rape, forcible sexual penetration, lewd acts on children under 14, continuous sexual abuse of a child, and conviction of qualifying offenses as a habitual sex offender. The tier is determined by the offense of conviction, not by factors the judge weighs. This is why which charge you plead to or are convicted of matters enormously for the rest of your life.
Tier 1 and Tier 2 registrants may petition for removal from the registry under Penal Code § 290.5 after completing the applicable minimum registration period (10 years for Tier 1, 20 years for Tier 2). The petition is filed in superior court and the prosecution has the right to oppose it. The court will consider whether the petitioner poses a risk to public safety and whether any disqualifying conditions apply. Tier 3 registrants generally cannot petition for removal. For those who qualify, the petition process can meaningfully change life circumstances, and it requires legal assistance to navigate correctly.
Expungement under Penal Code ¬ß 1203.4 is generally not available for anyone sentenced to state prison, which covers most felony sex offenses. Even where a technical expungement is possible (some misdemeanor sex offenses or cases resolved without prison), it does not relieve the duty to register as a sex offender, does not remove the record from the Megan’s Law website, and does not eliminate immigration consequences. The availability and value of expungement for sex crimes is extremely limited. Our expungement attorneys can advise whether any form of post-conviction relief applies to your specific situation.
Many California sex offense convictions qualify as “aggravated felonies” or “crimes involving moral turpitude” under federal immigration law. An aggravated felony conviction requires mandatory deportation and bars all forms of discretionary relief, including asylum, cancellation of removal, and adjustment of status. This applies to lawful permanent residents and visa holders as well as undocumented individuals. Even misdemeanor sex offenses may have immigration consequences. If you are not a U.S. citizen, immigration consequences must be analyzed before any plea is entered. An immigration-unaware plea can result in permanent deportation regardless of how long you have lived in the United States.
False sex crime allegations are not rare, and they follow identifiable patterns. Cases arising from contested custody, divorce, financial disputes, or relationship retaliation require a defense built around motive. Your attorney will investigate the complainant’s background, obtain all communications between the parties, identify inconsistencies in the account, and present the jury with a coherent explanation for why the accusation was made. Physical and digital evidence can corroborate or contradict the complainant’s version of events. Early investigation, before evidence is lost and memories fade, is critical in false accusation cases.
California has extended the statute of limitations for sex offenses against minors significantly. Under Penal Code § 801.1 and related provisions, certain sex offenses committed against persons under 18 may be prosecuted until the victim turns 40. Some offenses have no statute of limitations at all under Penal Code § 799. The specific limitations period depends on the offense charged, when it occurred, and whether the victim was a minor. If you are facing charges for alleged conduct that occurred years or decades ago, statute of limitations analysis is a critical early step. An expired limitations period is a complete defense if properly raised.
Tier 2 and Tier 3 registrants are generally listed on the California Department of Justice’s public Megan’s Law website under Penal Code ¬ß 290.46. The listing typically includes name, photograph, physical description, city of residence, and the offense of conviction. Tier 1 registrants are generally not posted publicly unless law enforcement makes a specific determination. The public posting is one of the most significant collateral consequences of a conviction requiring registration, affecting employment, housing, and personal relationships continuously.
Residency restrictions under Jessica’s Law (Proposition 83, 2006) originally prohibited all registered sex offenders on parole from living within 2,000 feet of schools and parks. The California Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in In re Taylor, 60 Cal.4th 1019, significantly limited blanket enforcement of these restrictions for parolees, holding they could not be applied categorically where compliant housing was effectively unavailable. In practice, residency restrictions for parolees must now be based on individualized risk determinations. However, individually imposed conditions by a court or parole board, and local ordinances in some jurisdictions, may still restrict where you can live. Residency restrictions remain a practical challenge that requires case-by-case legal analysis.
Federal International Megan’s Law requires that a unique identifier marking be placed on the passports of covered sex offenders. The law also requires advance notification to destination countries when a covered sex offender intends to travel internationally. Many countries deny entry to individuals with this passport identifier. The effect is a significant practical restriction on international travel that is, for most registrants, permanent. If you are currently registered or expect to be, you should discuss travel implications with your attorney before making any international travel plans.
Active-duty military personnel convicted of sex offenses face proceedings that run alongside the civilian criminal case. The military can pursue administrative separation, which may result in an other-than-honorable discharge that eliminates most veteran benefits. Security clearances are virtually always revoked. The loss of GI Bill eligibility, healthcare benefits, and pension can represent enormous financial consequences independent of the civilian sentence. If you are active duty or a veteran, the interplay between civilian and military consequences must be addressed from the start.
Yes. Most California professional licensing boards have authority to deny, suspend, or revoke licenses for convictions involving moral turpitude or crimes directly related to professional fitness. Sex offense convictions almost universally meet these standards. Medical licenses, nursing licenses, law licenses, teaching credentials, real estate licenses, and contractor licenses are among those at risk. In many cases, sex offender registration itself is independently disqualifying regardless of whether a formal revocation proceeding is initiated. Licensing consequences are separate from criminal consequences and require their own analysis and potential legal response.
Polygraph results are inadmissible in California criminal proceedings. They cannot be introduced as evidence at trial. However, the examination process itself creates investigative risk: statements made during or around the examination can potentially be used against you even if the polygraph results themselves cannot. Prosecution and law enforcement sometimes use the polygraph examination as an interrogation tool. You should never agree to take a polygraph in connection with a sex crime investigation without first discussing it in detail with your attorney, who can advise whether any scenario exists in which it could help you.
The key distinction is consent and force. Penal Code ¬ß 261.5 (“statutory rape”) applies to consensual sexual intercourse where one participant is under 18. The offense is defined by the victim’s age, not by force or lack of consent. In contrast, Penal Code ¬ß 261 requires that the intercourse was non-consensual, accomplished by force, violence, duress, menace, or fraud. Rape under ¬ß 261 carries substantially higher penalties and triggers mandatory Tier 3 lifetime registration. Statutory rape under ¬ß 261.5 is a wobbler in many circumstances and does not automatically require registration. The distinction between these charges is one of the most consequential in California sex crimes law.
After arrest, you will be booked, photographed, and fingerprinted at a detention facility. You will be held for arraignment, typically within 48 hours (excluding weekends and holidays). You have the absolute right to remain silent and to have an attorney present before answering any questions. Exercise both rights immediately. Do not attempt to explain yourself to law enforcement, other inmates, or anyone other than your attorney. At arraignment, your attorney can address bail. The earlier you retain counsel, the more strategic options are available before the prosecution locks in its theory of the case.
Yes. Federal child exploitation offenses under 18 U.S.C. ¬ß 2252, ¬ß 2252A, and related statutes carry mandatory minimum sentences that California state courts cannot impose, and federal sentencing guidelines dramatically increase exposure for multiple images, distribution, or production. Federal charges are prosecuted in U.S. District Court by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and are generally considered more severe and harder to resolve than comparable state charges. Our firm handles federal sex crimes in the Central and Southern Districts of California. See our federal criminal defense practice page for more information.
A sex crime charge carries consequences that extend far beyond the courtroom. The decisions made in the coming days and weeks will shape the rest of your life. You need an attorney who understands the full scope of what you face and who has the trial experience and strategic knowledge to fight for the best possible outcome.
ALL Trial Lawyers defends clients across Southern California against the full range of sex crime charges. Free, confidential consultations are available. Phones answered every day.
Or submit a confidential online inquiry
Hablamos Español | Arabic spoken | 15 Southern California offices
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is different. The information on this page is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Criminal statutes, penalties, and registration requirements are subject to amendment. Contact a qualified California sex crimes defense attorney for advice specific to your situation. ALL Trial Lawyers (d/b/a of Abuershaid Law, APC) serves clients in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties, as well as in the U.S. District Courts for the Central and Southern Districts of California.
All fields are required. If you need immediate assistance, do not hesitate to call us at (866) 811-4255.