20+ year of experience
Trial ready
Personal attention
A conviction on your record does not have to define what comes next. Right now, that record may be costing you job offers, housing applications, and professional licenses you cannot obtain or keep. California law gives many people with past convictions a direct legal path to relief. An expungement attorney can help you use that path.
Call (866) 811-4255 Free Consultation
Send a Confidential Message
California’s post-conviction relief framework is far more complex than a simple form-filing exercise. There are at least a dozen distinct statutes that apply depending on the nature of the conviction, how the sentence was served, whether probation was involved, and when the offense occurred. Choosing the wrong statute, filing in the wrong court, or missing a procedural step can result in a denial that delays your relief by months or longer.
Beyond the mechanics of filing, the district attorney has the right to oppose your petition. A judge exercises independent discretion on every petition and weighs factors that an attorney experienced with post-conviction proceedings knows how to address. The difference between a well-prepared petition and a rushed one can be the difference between a dismissal order and a denial.
There is also the question of strategy. In many cases, the right move before filing for expungement under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4 is to first petition for early termination of probation under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.3, or to reduce a wobbler felony to a misdemeanor under Cal. Penal Code § 17(b). Getting these sequenced correctly matters.
At ALL Trial Lawyers, Mohammad “Mo” Abuershaid brings the perspective of a former Orange County Public Defender. He has seen post-conviction proceedings from both sides of the courtroom. His team understands which judges respond to which arguments and how to present your petition in the strongest possible light. This is not a document-preparation service. It is representation by trial-tested lawyers who know California criminal courts.
Serving all of Southern California: Orange County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, and San Diego County. Free, confidential consultation available. Call anytime: phones answered every day. (866) 811-4255.
When California courts granted your conviction, the record became part of a public database maintained by the California Department of Justice (DOJ). That record does not age out on its own. Background check companies pull it, employers see it, landlords screen for it, and licensing boards review it. Understanding exactly which statute applies to your situation is the first step toward fixing it.
Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4 is the primary relief statute. It applies to defendants who were placed on probation and either completed probation successfully or obtained an early termination order. After dismissal under § 1203.4, the conviction is withdrawn, a plea of not guilty is entered, and the case is dismissed. This applies to both misdemeanor and felony probation cases, with important exceptions.
Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4a provides relief for misdemeanor convictions where no probation was imposed. A one-year waiting period typically applies from the date of judgment. This statute is commonly used for infractions and minor misdemeanor convictions where the defendant paid a fine and served no probation.
AB 109 (2011) shifted responsibility for certain lower-level felonies from state prison to county jail. Defendants sentenced to county jail under this realignment structure are not eligible under § 1203.4 unless they were also placed on probation. Cal. Penal Code § 1203.41 fills this gap, providing a dismissal mechanism for felonies served in county jail under the realignment framework.
Cal. Penal Code § 1203.42 addresses pre-realignment felony convictions where the sentence was served in county jail (not state prison). Relief is available after a two-year period following completion of sentence, parole, or supervision.
| Statute | Who It Covers | Key Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| PC § 1203.4 | Probation cases (misdemeanor + felony) | Complete or terminate probation; no current charges |
| PC § 1203.4a | Non-probation misdemeanors | 1-year waiting period after judgment |
| PC § 1203.41 | Realigned felonies (county jail under AB 109) | Completion of sentence and supervision |
| PC § 1203.42 | Pre-realignment county jail felonies | 2 years after sentence completion |
| PC § 17(b) | Wobbler felony reductions | Court discretion; filed before or with expungement |
| PC § 851.8 | Factual innocence petition | No reasonable cause for arrest; seals and destroys record |
| PC § 851.87 | Arrest record sealing (pre-filing diversion completion) | Successful completion of pre-filing diversion |
| PC § 851.90 | Arrest record sealing (certain resolutions) | Arrest resolved in specified favorable ways |
| PC § 851.91 | Arrest record sealing (no conviction) | Arrest without conviction (not factual innocence) |
| PC § 851.93 (AB 1076) | Automatic relief: “Clean Slate Act” | Effective July 1, 2023; DOJ identifies eligible records |
| SB 731 (2022) | Expanded automatic felony sealing | Effective July 1, 2023; more felony categories now covered |
| PC § 1170.18 | Prop 47 resentencing / redesignation | Eligible felonies reclassified as misdemeanors |
| PC § 11361.8 | Prop 64 cannabis relief | Cannabis offenses eligible for reduction or dismissal |
| PC § 4852.01 et seq. | Certificate of Rehabilitation | 5 to 10 year waiting period after release; serves as pardon application |
| Governor’s Pardon (Cal. Const. art. V, § 8) | Full executive pardon | Governor’s discretion; typically after Certificate of Rehabilitation |
Effective July 1, 2023, California’s “Clean Slate” legislation created automatic relief for many eligible Californians. Under Cal. Penal Code § 851.93 (enacted by AB 1076, 2019), the DOJ is required to automatically seal qualifying arrest records and dismiss qualifying convictions without the individual filing a petition. SB 731 (effective the same date) expanded automatic sealing to cover additional felony categories that complete their probation or supervision without re-offense. If you believe you may qualify for automatic relief, an attorney can verify whether the DOJ has acted on your record and whether any follow-up is needed.
Proposition 47 (2014) reduced certain felony theft and drug possession offenses to misdemeanors. Individuals still serving felony sentences for those offenses at the time, or who completed their sentences, can petition under Cal. Penal Code § 1170.18 to have felonies redesignated as misdemeanors. Once redesignated, the record may then be eligible for expungement. Proposition 64 (2016) similarly provides relief under Cal. Penal Code § 11361.8 for cannabis-related convictions. Our attorneys handle these intersecting remedies as part of a comprehensive post-conviction strategy. If you were charged with a drug offense, multiple layers of relief may be available.
For individuals who served time in state prison and are not eligible for standard expungement, the Certificate of Rehabilitation under Cal. Penal Code § 4852.01 et seq. provides an alternative path. It requires a waiting period of five to ten years after release, demonstrates rehabilitation, and upon issuance by the court, automatically serves as an application for a Governor’s pardon. A full pardon under Cal. Const. art. V, § 8 restores civil rights but does not seal or destroy the underlying record.
The formal sentence ends on a date certain. The collateral consequences of a criminal conviction do not. California law imposes dozens of statutory barriers on people with criminal records, and private actors such as employers, landlords, and licensing bodies impose additional ones. The practical impact depends on the type of conviction, the industry you work in, and the context in which the record is discovered.
Most background checks surface criminal convictions instantly. Under Cal. Labor Code § 432.7, employers generally may not ask about arrests that did not result in conviction, and a dismissed conviction under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4 allows most applicants to lawfully answer “no conviction” on private employer applications. However, this protection has exceptions: certain public sector jobs, law enforcement positions, and jobs requiring background clearance by state or federal agencies may still require disclosure.
Many private landlords run criminal background checks and deny housing applications on the basis of conviction history. While some California cities have adopted “fair chance” housing ordinances, state law does not uniformly prohibit landlords from considering conviction history. Expungement can meaningfully reduce the number of adverse housing decisions a person faces.
California licensing boards operate under their own rules about when and how they may consider criminal history. Many boards are governed by Cal. Business and Professions Code § 480 et seq., which restricts denial based on convictions not “substantially related” to the license duties. After expungement, an applicant may be required to disclose the conviction when the board’s application specifically asks about dismissed convictions. An expungement does not automatically guarantee a license, but it demonstrates successful completion of sentence and can materially improve an applicant’s position before the board.
This is one of the most significant limitations of California expungement. A state court dismissal under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4 does not eliminate immigration consequences under federal law. For purposes of federal immigration proceedings, the conviction continues to exist. Non-citizens facing expungement decisions should consult with both a criminal defense attorney and an immigration attorney before proceeding. The intersection of a prior domestic violence conviction and immigration status deserves particular attention because federal deportability grounds for domestic violence remain unaffected by state dismissal.
A state expungement does not restore firearms rights for felony convictions. Under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)), a person convicted of a felony remains prohibited from possessing firearms notwithstanding a state court dismissal under § 1203.4. A Governor’s pardon or Certificate of Rehabilitation may restore state firearms rights in some circumstances, but does not cure the federal firearms prohibition for most felonies. Anyone with a prior felony should obtain legal advice before possessing a firearm, regardless of state expungement status.
An expunged conviction continues to count as a “strike” for purposes of California’s Three Strikes sentencing law. The dismissal of the conviction under § 1203.4 has no effect on its use as a prior qualifying conviction in a subsequent prosecution.
Important: The record still shows as “dismissed” in the DOJ database and remains accessible to law enforcement. It is not erased. An attorney can advise you on exactly how the dismissal will appear and what disclosure is legally required in your specific context.
Expungement is not simply a matter of submitting paperwork. There are legal strategies that meaningfully improve outcomes, and attorneys who know California criminal courts use them.
Many California felonies are “wobblers,” meaning they can be charged or punished as either a felony or a misdemeanor. Under Cal. Penal Code § 17(b), the court has discretion to reduce a wobbler felony to a misdemeanor at the time of sentencing, upon termination of probation, or any time the defendant petitions the court. Reducing a felony to a misdemeanor before seeking expungement changes the record from a felony conviction to a misdemeanor conviction. This can be critical for professional licensing, and it ensures the expungement order reflects a misdemeanor dismissal rather than a felony dismissal. Our attorneys evaluate every case for PC 17(b) eligibility as the first step in any expungement strategy.
You cannot file a § 1203.4 petition until probation is terminated. If you are still on probation, the path forward begins with a petition for early termination under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.3. Courts grant early termination when the defendant has demonstrated good conduct, completed all probation conditions, and presents compelling reasons. Successfully terminating probation early shortens the waiting period to expungement and demonstrates exactly the kind of rehabilitation a judge looks for when ruling on a § 1203.4 petition.
For individuals who were arrested but against whom charges were not filed, or who were acquitted at trial, a factual innocence petition under Cal. Penal Code § 851.8 goes further than expungement. It seeks a judicial finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe the individual committed the offense. If granted, the arrest record is sealed and destroyed, not merely dismissed. This is a higher legal standard than expungement, but the outcome is more complete relief. A § 851.8 petition is appropriate where the facts genuinely support a finding of innocence, not merely where charges could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Several statutes address arrests that did not result in conviction. Cal. Penal Code § 851.91 allows sealing of arrest records when the arrest did not result in a conviction. Cal. Penal Code § 851.87 covers arrests resolved through pre-filing diversion programs where the defendant successfully completed diversion. Cal. Penal Code § 851.90 addresses certain other favorable resolutions. These statutes operate independently of the expungement statutes and are worth evaluating whenever an arrest record is visible on a background check.
Not all sex offenses are eligible for expungement. Convictions under Cal. Penal Code §§ 286(c), 288, 288a(c), 288.5, 289(j), and 261.5(d) (sex offenses against minors under specified sections) are explicitly excluded from relief under § 1203.4. Offenders required to register under Cal. Penal Code § 290 may face additional restrictions. Anyone with a sex offense conviction should consult with our sex crimes defense attorneys for a thorough evaluation of available options, which may include petition for removal from the sex offender registry under separate statutory criteria.
Many California DUI convictions under Cal. Veh. Code § 23152 are misdemeanor probation cases that qualify for § 1203.4 relief. After probation ends or is terminated early, the conviction can typically be dismissed. A dismissed DUI still shows as dismissed on a DMV record and may still be used to enhance a subsequent DUI charge within ten years. Our DUI defense team handles both the original defense and post-conviction expungement proceedings.
California expungement is broadly available, but not universal. Understanding the disqualifying factors before filing prevents wasted effort and protects you from filings that could highlight a record to prosecutors without achieving relief.
You are not eligible for expungement under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4 if:
These limitations mean that the right approach for ineligible individuals is often a Certificate of Rehabilitation, a Governor’s pardon, or a different statutory mechanism. Our attorneys evaluate every available avenue, not just the primary petition.
Understanding what the process looks like from start to finish helps you know what to expect and how an attorney adds value at each stage.
Every case begins with a review of the conviction record, the terms of sentence, the type of offense, and whether any disqualifying factors exist. The attorney determines which statute applies (§ 1203.4, § 1203.4a, § 1203.41, § 1203.42, or another mechanism), whether a PC 17(b) reduction or PC 1203.3 early termination must come first, and whether the Clean Slate Act has already provided automatic relief.
The expungement petition is filed in the court of conviction using the relevant Judicial Council forms, supplemented by a supporting memorandum of points and authorities. A well-drafted petition documents: the original conviction and sentence; the conditions of probation and their completion; any probation violations and their resolution; factors demonstrating rehabilitation; the petitioner’s conduct, employment, community ties, and circumstances since conviction; and the specific legal basis for relief. Courts value thoroughness and candor.
The petition is filed with the court clerk and served on the district attorney’s office for the county where the conviction occurred. Proof of service must be filed with the court confirming that the DA received timely notice. Proper service is a jurisdictional requirement. Failures at this stage create procedural problems that cause delays or dismissals of the petition.
After filing, the court schedules a hearing date. Timelines vary significantly by county. Some courts grant or deny petitions on the papers without requiring a personal appearance. Others require the petitioner or attorney to appear. In counties with higher petition volume, hearing dates may be set weeks or months out.
The district attorney reviews the petition and may file written opposition. DA opposition is more common in cases involving probation violations, serious offenses, victim impact, or where the petitioner has subsequent criminal history. When opposition is filed, the hearing becomes contested. Your attorney submits a reply and prepares oral argument addressing the DA’s specific objections. Knowing how to respond to the most common grounds for DA opposition is a key skill for expungement counsel.
The judge has discretion to grant or deny the petition, particularly where there was a probation violation. Courts consider: the nature and circumstances of the underlying offense; the petitioner’s criminal history since conviction; evidence of rehabilitation and stable lifestyle; hardship caused by the conviction; time elapsed since conviction; compliance with all conditions of probation; employment history; community involvement; and letters of support. A well-prepared presentation on these factors can make the difference on a difficult petition.
If the petition is granted, the court enters an order dismissing the conviction. The original plea or verdict is withdrawn, a not-guilty plea is entered, and the case is dismissed. If denied, the order typically sets out the basis for denial. Depending on the reason for denial, a renewed petition may be filed after a period of time, with additional evidence of rehabilitation or correction of any procedural deficiency.
After the court enters the dismissal order, the court clerk transmits the update to the California Department of Justice. The DOJ updates the statewide criminal history system. This process can take several weeks. Private background check vendors update their databases on varying schedules; some require affirmative notice. Your attorney can provide you with a certified copy of the court’s dismissal order to present directly to employers or licensing agencies that have not yet received the updated information.
Most expungement denials are preventable. These are the most common errors our attorneys see when reviewing prior self-filed or poorly prepared petitions.
Filing before probation is formally terminated (or before the applicable waiting period has run) results in automatic ineligibility. Some individuals are surprised to learn that completing all probation requirements and paying all fines does not mean probation is “terminated.” It must be formally ordered by the court, either at the end of the probation period or by early termination motion.
A petition that ignores documented probation violations invites an easy denial. The judge will see the violations in the record. A strong petition acknowledges the violations, explains the circumstances, and presents evidence of what has changed since. Judges respond to honesty and demonstrated growth, not omission.
Petitioning under § 1203.4 for a state prison sentence, or under § 1203.4a for a probation case, creates procedural defects. The court may deny the petition on technical grounds rather than on the merits.
Filing for expungement of a wobbler felony without first seeking a PC 17(b) reduction leaves a less favorable outcome on the record. Once the § 1203.4 order is entered, seeking a retroactive PC 17(b) reduction becomes more complicated. The reduction and expungement can and should be coordinated in the same proceeding.
When the district attorney files written opposition, there is a limited window to respond. Missing the reply deadline leaves the opposition unanswered before the judge.
The Clean Slate Act is not instantaneous for all eligible records. Processing by the DOJ takes time, and some records that should qualify have not yet been updated. Assuming your record was automatically cleared without verifying with the DOJ or an attorney can lead to embarrassing situations on job applications.
A California expungement has no effect on federal conviction records or federal agency databases. If you have a prior federal conviction, a separate process is required, and California state law cannot help. Our firm’s criminal defense attorneys can advise on what, if any, federal post-conviction remedies may be available in your situation.
If you have a prior California conviction and want to know whether expungement is available, here are the concrete steps to take immediately.
With over 10,000 cases handled and 15 offices across Southern California, ALL Trial Lawyers has the depth and geographic presence to handle post-conviction matters in every major county in the region. The firm brings the perspective of former public defenders who have worked inside these court systems, advocating for clients in precisely the situations they now handle as private counsel.
Founding attorney Mo Abuershaid earned a 10.0 Avvo Rating, the Avvo Clients’ Choice designation for 2020 through 2025, and Super Lawyers Rising Stars recognition every year from 2021 through 2026. He was selected to the National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 in 2020 and 2021, and earned the Top 10 Young Lawyer recognition from the Orange County Criminal Defense Lawyers in 2023.
The firm serves clients in English, Spanish, and Arabic, and offers free, confidential consultations with no commitment. Whether your conviction is from five years ago or twenty, and whether you are looking to clear a misdemeanor or navigate a more complex multi-step relief strategy, the team at ALL Trial Lawyers will assess your case honestly and build the strongest petition your record allows.
Hablamos Español. Se habla árabe. Call (866) 811-4255 or visit any of our 15 Southern California offices.
No. Expungement under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4 does not erase or delete your criminal record. The record continues to exist in the California DOJ database, but the case status changes from “convicted” to “dismissed.” Law enforcement, licensing boards, and certain public agencies can still access and view the record. What expungement does is allow you to legally answer “no conviction” on most private employer applications, and it removes the conviction from many commercial background check results. The distinction between “dismissed” and “erased” is legally meaningful and important to understand before filing.
For most probation cases under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.4, you may file as soon as probation is formally terminated. There is no mandatory additional waiting period once probation ends. The key is that probation must be fully terminated by court order, either at the natural end of the probation period or by an early termination motion under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.3. For non-probation misdemeanors under § 1203.4a, a one-year waiting period from the date of judgment typically applies.
Often, yes. If you are still on probation, you must obtain early termination under Cal. Penal Code § 1203.3 before you can file a § 1203.4 petition. Even if probation is nearing its end naturally, filing a combined early termination and expungement petition can streamline the process and signal to the court that you are proactively seeking to resolve the matter. Courts that are willing to grant early termination are typically also disposed to grant the related expungement. Our attorneys routinely handle these as coordinated, sequential filings.
The Clean Slate Act (AB 1076, effective July 1, 2023, codified at Cal. Penal Code § 851.93, combined with SB 731) requires the California DOJ to automatically seal qualifying arrests and dismiss qualifying convictions without requiring the individual to file a petition. Eligibility depends on the type of offense, how the case was resolved, and whether the waiting period has run. Not every qualifying record has been updated yet, and the process is ongoing. An attorney can verify whether automatic relief should have been applied to your record and assist with any necessary follow-up with the DOJ.
Court filing fees for expungement petitions vary by county and offense type. Beyond court fees, attorney fees depend on the complexity of the case: a straightforward single-conviction expungement with no probation violations costs less than a multi-step matter involving a PC 17(b) reduction, early termination of probation, and a contested hearing. ALL Trial Lawyers offers a free consultation to assess your specific situation, after which we provide a clear fee estimate. We do not believe in surprise billing.
Yes. The district attorney’s office is served with the petition and has the right to file written opposition. In practice, DA opposition is more common in cases involving serious offenses, probation violations, multiple convictions, or where the petitioner has subsequent criminal history. When the DA opposes, the hearing becomes contested and your attorney must be prepared to address the specific grounds raised. A well-prepared petition that honestly addresses potential concerns upfront reduces the likelihood of DA opposition and improves the outcome even when opposition is filed.
For most private employer applications, no. Cal. Labor Code § 432.7 generally prohibits private employers from asking about, or considering, arrests that did not result in conviction, and a § 1203.4 dismissal allows the applicant to answer “no conviction” in most contexts. However, there are significant exceptions: applications for public agency employment, law enforcement positions, jobs requiring background clearance from state or federal agencies, and applications for licenses that specifically ask about dismissed convictions may all require disclosure. The rules are fact-specific, and an attorney can advise you on what disclosure is required for your specific situation.
It can help, but it is not a guarantee. Many California licensing boards are governed by Cal. Business and Professions Code § 480 et seq., which limits denial of licenses based on convictions not substantially related to the license duties and requires boards to consider rehabilitation evidence. After expungement, the application still shows the conviction as “dismissed,” and the board may still ask about it. What expungement provides is a court order of dismissal, which is tangible, objective evidence of completed sentence and judicial acknowledgment of rehabilitation. Boards respond to that evidence. An attorney who handles both criminal defense and post-conviction matters can help prepare the strongest possible license application in light of the prior record.
No. This is one of the most critical limitations to understand. A California state court expungement under § 1203.4 does not eliminate the immigration consequences of a conviction under federal law. For purposes of federal immigration proceedings, including removal, inadmissibility, and naturalization, the conviction continues to exist regardless of the state court dismissal. Non-citizens, lawful permanent residents, DACA recipients, and visa holders should consult with both a criminal defense attorney and a qualified immigration attorney before making any decisions about post-conviction filings.
No. A California expungement does not restore firearms rights for felony convictions. Under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)), a person convicted of a felony remains prohibited from possessing firearms. A state court order of dismissal under § 1203.4 does not cure the federal firearms prohibition. A California Governor’s pardon or a Certificate of Rehabilitation may restore certain state-law firearms rights in some circumstances, but the interaction with federal law is complex. Anyone with a prior felony should obtain specific legal advice before possessing a firearm. Do not assume that expungement resolves this issue.
Not directly. A California court order dismissing a conviction binds California courts and California agencies. Other states’ courts, government agencies, and employers may or may not recognize the dismissal when conducting their own background checks. Some states’ background check systems pull from the California DOJ database and will reflect the “dismissed” status. Others pull from older or different databases that may still reflect the original conviction. For anyone seeking employment, housing, or licensing in another state, it is worth verifying how that state’s background check infrastructure handles California dismissal orders.
No. California state law has no jurisdiction over federal criminal records. A state court order under § 1203.4 or any other California statute cannot affect a federal conviction, a federal arrest record, or records maintained by federal agencies such as the FBI. Federal post-conviction relief is governed entirely by federal law and is a separate, more limited process. If you have both a California conviction and a federal conviction, the California expungement addresses only the state record. Contact our office for guidance on what federal options, if any, may apply.
Potentially yes, but each conviction is evaluated and petitioned separately. If you have three separate convictions across three cases, you must file three separate petitions, potentially in different courts if the convictions were in different counties. The eligibility analysis applies independently to each conviction. Some may qualify and some may not. An attorney will review your complete criminal history and identify which convictions are eligible, which statutes apply to each, and what the optimal sequencing and strategy is across all of them.
They are fundamentally different both in what they require and what they achieve. An expungement under § 1203.4 is available after a conviction: it dismisses the conviction but does not result in a finding of innocence, and the record continues to exist as “dismissed.” A factual innocence petition under Cal. Penal Code § 851.8 applies to arrest situations where no conviction occurred, and seeks a judicial finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe the individual committed the offense. If granted, the court orders the arrest record sealed and destroyed, not merely dismissed. The § 851.8 standard is higher (it requires affirmatively establishing lack of reasonable cause, not merely showing eligibility for dismissal), but the outcome is more complete relief.
A Certificate of Rehabilitation under Cal. Penal Code § 4852.01 et seq. is a separate form of post-conviction relief intended primarily for individuals who served time in state prison and are not eligible for standard expungement. It requires a waiting period of five to ten years after release from custody (depending on the offense), followed by a period of demonstrated rehabilitation, and then a court hearing. If granted, the Certificate serves as an automatic application for a Governor’s pardon. It does not seal or destroy the underlying conviction record, but it is a significant credential that licensing boards and employers recognize as strong evidence of rehabilitation. Unlike expungement, it does not allow the individual to answer “no conviction” on employment applications.
A Governor’s pardon under Cal. Const. art. V, § 8 and Cal. Penal Code § 4800 et seq. is the highest form of post-conviction relief California provides. It is an act of executive clemency that forgives the offense and restores certain civil rights, including, in many cases, the right to possess firearms under state law (though not under federal law for most felonies). The pardon does not erase or seal the underlying conviction record. The typical pathway is first obtaining a Certificate of Rehabilitation, which automatically applies to the Governor for a pardon. For individuals still on parole or within the waiting period, a direct application to the Governor is also possible but is rarely granted. Our attorneys can advise on whether you are at a stage where a pardon application makes strategic sense.
A denial is not necessarily the end of the road. Petitions are commonly denied for procedural reasons (wrong statute, insufficient waiting period, current charges), which can be corrected and refiled. Petitions denied on discretionary grounds (probation violations, subsequent criminal history, nature of offense) can be refiled after additional time demonstrating rehabilitation, or challenged if the court applied the wrong legal standard. An attorney will review the order denying relief, identify the basis for denial, and advise on the best path forward.
A conviction does not have to follow you into every job application, housing form, and licensing proceeding for the rest of your life. California law has given many people a direct path to relief. The attorneys at ALL Trial Lawyers will tell you honestly whether that path is open to you, which statutes apply, and what the realistic outcome looks like. Call today or send a confidential message. The consultation is free.
Call (866) 811-4255
Send a Confidential Message
Free consultation. No obligation. Phones answered every day. Hablamos Español.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is different. The information on this page is general legal information about California law and is not legal advice for your specific situation. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statute applicability depends on the specific facts of each case; consult a licensed California attorney for advice tailored to your circumstances.
All fields are required. If you need immediate assistance, do not hesitate to call us at (866) 811-4255.